As has happened with every such event in the past, I experienced a deep disquiet when the news of the Washington Navy Yard shootings hit the wires on September 16th.  Yes, a large military base close to the seat of American government seemed just as likely a target for the usual Moslem suspects as the Boston Marathon, and in the event it was a politically irrelevant black psycho.  But what if it had been a white man with a private arsenal and the regulation “links to white supremacist groups”?  What if some disturbed half-wit had hit out for the cause at the cost of a dozen completely innocent lives?

Obviously, the implications for WN would have been serious and harmful.  Yet more moral obstacles to its appointment with history would have been piled up.  Yet more scrutiny from the security state would be brought to bear.  Yet more certain would be the path of dispossession and marginalisation which our people are treading.

But what if we turn the “what if” question around?  What if strikes against the Establishment were systematic and serial.  What if they were embedded in the context of a violent revolutionary or “urban guerilla” struggle, and did not generate the same revulsion and alienation in the popular mind, or a least a significant part of it?

In essence, what are the conditions under which extra-legal action in the people’s cause engenders enough popular moral, financial, and logistical support to maintain the prosecution of military objectives over a period of decades, if necessary?

Putting aside the problem of how such action could be organised and executed in the modern security state when nationalism is so controlled and weak, which others have addressed, I think it is interesting to look at some of the structural constraints which operate in European and North American societies.

READ MORE...

I’ve always been a bit of a petrol-head, and I thought I would write something about motoring.

A short while ago I came across an arresting photograph of a 1940’s Dodge Delivery Panel Van sitting sphinx-like in some late-spring North American field.  Time and the irresistible will of Nature had turned it into an inverted flower-pot.  It invited interpretation (some of which could even turn out to be relevant to Daniel’s recent exploration of new religious potentials, you never know).

Discounting the usual romantic allusions to decay and the fragility of Man’s design, what I saw there is a statement about mediation.  At the most obvious level, the image could be taken to represent the will of Nature to establish herself and remain established in a world of constant disorganisation, pushing through all obstruction, all negation, but having to be opportunistic, having to adapt to do so.  As such, it is a figure for all that we can say for sure – that is, free of religious creation myths and other speculative theories - about Source and subsistence.

READ MORE...

Graham Lister’s incessant invective against me here at MR requires some sort of resolution:

Posted by Graham_Lister on September 06, 2013, 02:00 PM | #

Authentic phenotypes that allow the “Holy Spirit” to be expressed.

Really?

Gee whiz that’s a new one for the biology textbooks.

Perhaps Mr. Bowery might write up a Princeton monograph on the subject?

And just where are we on the Bowery express from Crazyville to Loony Town?

Is it any wonder that even semi-serious people don’t seem to want to engage at MR?

Unbounded fuckwittery is not attractive, nor interesting, in anyway whatsoever.

These are not the words of a man with whom compromise is feasible.  There is no basis upon which we can “agree to disagree”.  He is persistent in accusing me of having an important, perhaps even dominant, deleterious effect on MR.  I could very well make the case that Lister’s persistent attacks are rendering the environment of MR repulsive to “semi-serious people”.  It certainly seems to be making MR repulsive to me and although Lister would certainly deny that I am, at best, “semi-serious”, my own perception is that I am indeed very serious and that I no longer wish to cast my pearls before such swine.

Therefore this will be my parting message to MR until such time as I have observed Lister to be absent for an extended period of time.

The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) Lab may not produce a Princeton Monograph, but it has produced work that requires serious philosophical inquiry:

There are few people in the world who have sacrificed more in attempting to directly address the bankruptcy of scientific theory reflected in the frustration of the Princeton researchers in the above video.  My own work includes obtaining funds from HP to continue work done by Paul Allen’s erstwhile think tank “Interval Research”, to correct foundational mathematics of the empirical world pursued by Russell and Whitehead in Volume IV of Principia Mathematica.  That remedial work on Volume IV was directed toward a quantitative theory of relations that dealt with casting much of quantum mechanics and the science of so-called “paranormal” phenomena as a branch of mereology—Lister’s supposed, according to GW, primary area of potential contribution to “the ontology project”.

My contention here is that this area of inquiry has been relentlessly repressed from two opposing directions by Jewish movements, one in the religious realm in the form, primarily but not exclusively, of so-called “Christianity”, and the other direction from the Jewish-dominated “Skeptics” who are the shock troops of post-Manhattan Project big science and the academy.  These opposing movements work, in concert with the myth-making machine of Hollywood (aka “Dreamworks” as the founding Jews of that company call it) to mold collective consciousness in a way that alienates Euroman from his authentic self and does so not just with ‘mass psychology” but with the manipulation of “mass consciousness” and attendant paranormal “miracles”. 

This area of knowledge is a cornerstone of Jewish power throughout the ages and we can expect that the state of their knowledge is, at least as practical folklore, vastly superior to anything have been able to achieve in the area.  This explains the virtual panic migration of east European Jews from within a relatively small geographic area, across Europe, across the Atlantic and across North America to Hollywood where they established “An Empire of Their Own” very shortly after Edison’s invention became known.

We are dealing with armaments so advanced that they make our piddling efforts with “The Ontology Project” look like flint blades against a nuclear arsenal.  So long as that project is significantly affected by rascals such as Lister, it will remain in the stone age.

This interview was conducted midst an SPLC-triggered media frenzy. Immediately after completing this interview, the New York Times reporters showed up at the Leith, North Dakota residence of Craig Cobb—declared one of the most dangerous men in the US by the SPLC’s “Hate Watch”. Listen for the true story behind the frenzied article that will soon appear in the New York Times, and get an idea of Craig Cobb, the man—not the mythic monster.

UPDATE 5: CNN called Cobb asking him for a short statement of his motive for buying up lots in Leith, ND.  This statement was to appear on CNN in some form—Cobb mentioned their ticker.  He asked me for my suggestion and I came up with this:

It is supremacist for the government to test its social theories on unwilling human subjects.  I am trying to find a refuge for people who agree with my social theories.

When CNN called him back for his answer, he decided to go with my suggestion.  At this point CNN told Cobb that the message would appear at 7:15pm EDT.

The message did not appear on the news ticker at 7:15pm nor at any time during the next 20 minutes.

UPDATE 4: Click this link then click “Recommend” to promote the interview with NYT readership.

UPDATE 3: The New York Times story broke and the comments couldn’t stand in starker contrast to those made on the Drudge-linked story (see Update 2).  The comments to the Drudge-linked story are not only sympathetic to someone attempting to set up a protected area, but there is significant mention of hypocrisy.  There are two “publics” here one adhering to old media and the other to new media.  An additional note:  None of the North Dakota news sites carrying this story, and there are several, allow comments from the public.

UPDATE 2:  Drudge is running with the AP story.  If you want to have a high impact for almost no labor or time, just click this link and vote my comment up.

UPDATE:  The Associate Press story was just carried by ABC at their website.  My comment on the AP story there:

jabowery • a few seconds ago
This sentence in the article is false: “He declines to talk about his upbringing and gives no indication as to why he adopted his supremacist platform.”

Indeed I just posted a comment here that linked to an hour and a half interview that was mostly about his upbringing and development of his beliefs, and it was censored.

Do you people have no shame?

According to the SPLC‘s Mark Potok, “This is much further advanced than anything we’ve seen.”

What was he talking about?

READ MORE...

Out of the Christian frying pan into the Holocaustian fire.

Sam Swerling, former Chairman of the Monday Club and Conservative Party Councillor, on the doctrine of National Preference:

Markus Willinger of Generation Identitaire, providing a general introduction to this new movement:

Laslo Virag, of the Hungarian Traditionalist School, on the criteria of the right:

Ruben Rosiers, formerly of Vlaams Blok, on Syria and the turn of the tide for the New World Order.